Open Letter- Criticising Proposed Law on Belief and Religion in Vietnam

Civil Rights Defenders and scores of other civil society organisations have written to the President of the Vietnam National Assembly on Vietnam’s draft Law on Belief and Religion expressing their concerns regarding the proposed Law.The draft law, which has been revised several times has drawn strong criticism from many religious communities, is expected to be voted into law by the National Assembly at its session in October-November 2016.

To read more about the current human rights situation in Vietnam please click here to access the Vietnam Country Report compiled by Civil Rights Defenders.

Open Letter- Criticising Proposed Law on Belief and Religion in Vietnam (See Below)

_____________________________________________________________________________________

Open Letter to the President of the Vietnam National Assembly on Vietnam’s draft Law on Belief and Religion 

 

The Hon. Nguyen Thi Kim Ngan President,

National Assembly of Vietnam Doc Lap Street,

Quan Thanh Ba Dinh,

Hanoi

Dear National Assembly President Nguyen Kim Ngân,

We, the undersigned civil society organizations, are writing to express our concerns about the proposed Law on Belief and Religion in Vietnam. The draft law, which has been revised several times and drawn strong criticism from many religious communities, is expected to be voted into law by the National Assembly at its session in October-November 2016.

The most recent draft was discussed at a high-level meeting of the Communist Party’s Fatherland Front on 17 August, and circulated to certain religious communities for comment. An examination of the draft law that was published on the National Assembly website shows that the 9-chapter draft law contains some improvements, but also continues to place unacceptable restrictions on the right to freedom of religion or belief and other human rights. Specifically, basic guarantees of the right to freedom of religion or belief continue to be undermined by onerous registration requirements and excessive state interference in religious organizations’ internal affairs. Indeed, this and the previous versions of the law inherit from previous rules and regulations this emphasis on government control and management of religious life which is contrary to the spirit and principle of the right to freedom of religion or belief.

As mentioned above, the draft was circulated to certain religious communities for comment. However, one Catholic body also objected to the short time, from 18 to 30 of August, given for preparing their response to the draft law.(1) Furthermore, independent religious groups not registered with the government, such as the United Buddhist Church of Vietnam, were not consulted.

There have been some welcome improvements made in the draft law, including provisions for the right to change one’s religion, as well as to follow or not follow a religion, the right of some detainees “to use religious books and manifest their belief or religion”, and the right of religious organizations to participate in activities such as education, vocational training, medical care and social and humanitarian assistance.

Nevertheless, the recommendations below have emerged from some of the particular concerns expressed by religious communities in Vietnam, which are shared by the undersigned organisations.

1. The definition of a religion should be made consistent with Article 18 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR). 

In the current draft, a religious organization has been defined as “a group of people … which is recognized by the government” (our emphasis) (Article 2.13). This leaves members of religious organizations who cannot or choose not to register with the authorities in a legal limbo, with no legal safeguards for conducting religious activities.

2. Registration with the government should not be made a pre-requisite for the exercise of freedom of religion or belief. 

The onerous and complex registration process requires approval from the authorities for religious activities, operations and status as an organization. The guarantees outlined in Article 18 of the ICCPR are independent of and cannot be conditioned on any domestic process of notification, authorisation, recognition or registration.

3. The law must not allow officials to arbitrarily interfere in the internal affairs of religious organizations. 

Provisions in the law allow the authorities to interfere excessively in the internal decisions, appointments, training, teachings and programmes of religious organisations. Limitations on the manifestation of freedom of religion or belief must never exceed in either purpose or scope those permitted in article 18(3) of the ICCPR. As the UN Special Rapporteur on Freedom of Religion or Belief, Dr. Heiner Bielefeltd, said after his visit to Vietnam in 2014, “…registration should be an offer by the State but not a compulsory legal requirement.” 

4. Ambiguous and potentially discriminatory language should be removed. 

The draft law contains ambiguous language regarding “good traditional cultural values” (Article 10.1) and “sowing division” (Article 5.4), that could be used to discriminate against ethnic and indigenous minorities, independent groups and those whose religion or belief is seen as “foreign” (Article 2.12).

5. Provisions should be made to establish legal channels and mechanisms for people to file complaints, and have those complaints independently investigated and acted on, in cases of alleged violations of the right to freedom of religion or belief. 

For these reasons, we strongly urge that the law be revised, in consultation with religious community representatives, including those of non-recognized religious communities, and experts in international human rights law, to ensure that the law protects the right to freedom of religion or belief in line with article 18 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights.

We look forward to hearing from you about this important matter. Please reply to the VCHR coordinator Penelope Faulkner at penelope.faulkner@gmail.com or the CSW coordinator Benedict Rogers at benrogers@csw.org.uk.

Sincerely yours,

Original SIgnatories:

  • Benedict Rogers East Asia Team Leader, Christian Solidarity Worldwide
  • Vo Van Ai President, Vietnam Committee on Human Rights
  • Rafendi Djamin Director of Southeast Asia and Pacific Programme, Amnesty International
  • Phil Robertson Deputy Director, Asia Division, Human Rights Watch
  • Dimitris Christopoulos President, FIDH
  • Nina Shea Director, Hudson Institute Center for Religious Freedom
  • Hans Aage Gravaas Secretary General, Stefanus Alliance International
  • Robert Hårdh Executive Director, Civil Rights Defenders
  • Jostein Hole Kobbeltvedt Executive Director, Rafto Foundation for Human Rights
  • Nguyen Dinh Thang CEO & President, BPSOS

 

Additional Signatories

  • Joshua Cooper Executive Director, Hawai’i Institute for Human Rights
  • Ven. Thich Thanh Quang President, Executive Institute, Unified Buddhist Church of Vietnam
  • Lê Cong Cau Chairman, Buddhist Youth Movement of Vietnam (GDPTVN)
  • Ven. Thich Huyen Viet Chargé d’Affaires, Unified Buddhist Church of Vietnam Overseas
  • Nguyen Van Lia The Traditional Hoa Hao Buddhist Bloc 4
  • Tran Ngoc Suong The Popular Council of Cao Dai Religion
  • Charles Santiago MP Chairperson, ASEAN Parliamentarians for Human Rights (APHR)
  • Professor the Lord Alton of Liverpool Member of the UK All-Party Parliamentary Group on International Religious Freedom or Belief
  • Daniel Calingaert Acting President, Freedom House
  • John Edmundson President, Agir Ensemble pour les Droits de l’Homme
  • Ann Buwalda Executive Director, Jubilee Campaign USA
  • The 21st Century Wilberforce Initiative
  • Faith J. H. McDonnell Director, Religious Liberty Program, The Institute on Religion and Democracy
  • Lilly Bliatout President and Founder, Southeast Asia Monitor for Human Rights and Justice
  • Willy Fautré Director, Human Rights Without Frontiers
  • Vu Quoc Dung Executive Director VETO! Human Rights Defenders‘ Network
  • Former US Congressman Joseph Cao Chairman, Coalition for a Free and Democratic Vietnam
  • John Alles Executive Director, Montagnard Assistance Project
  • Tony Tran Chairman, Con Dau Parishioners Association
  • Katie Duong Overseas Representative, Popular Council of Cao Dai Religion
  • Rong Nay Chairman, Montagnard Human Rights Organization
  • Pastor A Ga Representative, Montagnard Evangelical Church of Christ
  • Vũ Quốc Ngữ CEO, Defend the Defenders
  • Huỳnh Thục Vy Coordinator, Vietnamese Women for Human Rights
  • Lanney Tran Chairwoman, Women for Human Rights in Vietnam 5
  • Nguyen Bac Truyen Vietnamese Political and Religious Prisoners’ Friendship Association
  • Vietnam Independent Civil Society Organizations Network (VICSON)
  • Matteo Mecacci President, International Campaign for Tibet
  • Bob Fu Founder and President, China Aid
  • Human Rights in China (HRIC)
  • Han Dong-Feng Executive Director, China Labour Bulletin
  • E-Ling Chiu Secretary General, Taiwan Association for Human Rights
  • Commonwealth Human Rights Initiative, New Delhi
  • Adilur Rahman Khan Secretary, Odhikar, Bangladesh
  • Alvin Jacobson Amnesty International USA Group 56 Lexington, MA
  • Kathy Herbst Amnesty International Group USA Group 524 Pittsburgh, PA
  • Michael De Dora Director of Public Policy, Center for Inquiry
  • Sara Colm Co-founder, Campaign to Abolish Torture in Vietnam
  • Isaac Six Advocacy Director, International Christian Concern
  • Helen Ngo Chairwoman, Committee for Religious Freedom in Vietnam
  • Nguyen Thanh Dung Association for Promotion of Freedom of Religions and Beliefs
  • Vietnamese FoRB Roundtable
  • Khin Ohmar Coordinator, Burma Partnership
  • Bjørn Engesland Secretary General, Norwegian Helsinki Committee

 

(1) Letter On Behalf of the Catholic Bishops Conference of Vietnam, signed by Bishop Peter Nguyen Van Kham, Deputy Secretary-general http://gpquinhon.org/qn/news/GIAO-HOI-VIET-NAM/Thu-cua-HDGMVN-gop-y-Du-thao-Luat-Tin-nguong-Ton-giao-5238/#.V9AIDzUSb55

Proposed Law in PDF format.

Categories: Statements.
Tags: Freedom of assembly, Freedom of religion or belief, SouthEast Asia, and Vietnam.
Regions: Vietnam.